It's great that they're doing this, but the importance of FT8 is that it
allows us to work 10 dB deeper into the noise that CW with great ops on
both ends. On this planet, where the electronic noise has increased by a
lot more than that over the last 20 years, that's a VERY BIG DEAL. And
it's why AA7JV, a great DXpeditioner, great CW op, and great engineer,
and realizing that on multi-week expeditions, 160M opening tended to
occur on only one or two nights, developed his system to allow
simultaneous operation CW and FT8 operation on 160M.
While I've always been primarily a CW op, and have been avoiding SSB for
several years, I've been using WSJT modes for nearly 15 years for small
signal work, mostly on 6M, but also on 160M to work EU from my QTH in
NorCal, and on 60M, where the allocation is for a half-dozen SSB
channels and power is limited to 100W EIRP. I just worked DX entity #102
on that band, loading an 80M dipole.
73, Jim K9YC
On 12/4/2024 7:57 AM, Doug Renwick wrote:
The following was posted on the 9L5A Web page at:
https://9l5a.wordpress.com/
Apart from that, the days follow one another with more than 10,000 QSOs
per day with an almost perfect balance between CW, SSB and FT8. It looks
so surprising compared to other expeditions that some criticize us for
doing too much CW and SSB; this is a shame! We had announced for a long
time that we would prioritize “human” modes, otherwise we would not have
planned 15 operators. It would for sure be much easier to leave 6 stations
running in FT8 and enjoy long nights of sleep, the beach and 31° water,
we would already have exceeded 100,000 QSOs. But this is not the vision
we have of radio in general and especially an expedition. Given the size
of the pileups, there is obviously (and fortunately) a large majority
who must think like us.
Doug
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|