To: | David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Mixed Digital Modes in HF Contests |
From: | Joe <nss@mwt.net> |
Date: | Tue, 14 Jan 2020 09:33:36 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
How about contact the JSCALL gang to see if they would like to work up
what is needed to make it like MTTY is for RTTY in N1MM+?
JSCALL already is anything goes in the message. it is like PSK-31, you can even chat with it yet it uses the FT-8 and maybe 4? transmissions. https://groups.io/g/js8call Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 1/13/2020 10:03 PM, David Gilbert wrote: Those are my sentiments entirely.FT4 is only broken because of the UI, not the mode. A better UI for FT4 would solve a LOT of problems. The sooner somebody comes up with one the better.Mixing modes in the same contest, whether it is mixing RTTY and FTx or mixing FT8 and FT4, is simply a very bad idea. The confusion and disruption it causes does nothing at all to advance FTx as a viable contest mode.73, Dave AB7E On 1/13/2020 10:34 AM, Ron Koenig wrote:If FT-4 had actually been released as a Contest Mode most of the issues would not exist. Sadly, it was not and because of it there is a mess. You have cross sections of people that will NOT log if they don't get aRR73 (They even refused to log With RR73 when they wanted RRR and then 73)lots of these people are Causal ops in the contests, the NIL's are intentional. You have people answering Contest CQ's that are not in Contest mode (If FT-4 was a Contest Mode, that would not be possible) Of course, Neitherside can properly log these as the exchange cannot be made... Some force itto log.... NIL FT-4 is very picky about time, many Many Q's go into a loop of repeats because one or both ops time has shifted a 10th, or QSB has pushed thesignal down just enough. Often, after wasting several cycles, one side willforce it to log.... NILI am a fan of the FT-Modes for contesting, I have high hopes that someonewill develop software that makes it work. I am Not a fan of FT-X in RTTY RU, or any other "Mixed" contest... Itsimply causes confusion, lowers QSO counts and causes people to make Sillyclaims that their FT-X rate rivaled RTTY... Ron, WV4P_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] World Wide Digi DX Contest Results., Tim Shoppa |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Orlando Contest Dinner Reminder, Sterling Mann |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Mixed Digital Modes in HF Contests, David Gilbert |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Mixed Digital Modes in HF Contests, Bruce Horn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |