CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Minority Report: FT4 - Robotic Contesting

To: "ktfrog007@aol.com" <ktfrog007@aol.com>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>, "wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com" <wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Minority Report: FT4 - Robotic Contesting
From: Hans Brakob <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 01:51:00 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
For curiosity’s sake, I would be interested in a contest where some robots were 
in the mix, but a contest of only robots would be a giant yawn.

73, de Hans, KØHB
“Just a Boy and his Radio”

________________________________
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com> on behalf of ktfrog007--- 
via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 8:40 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com; wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Minority Report: FT4 - Robotic Contesting


I'm sure I'm way deep in the minority but I'd love to see an automated contest 
run as an experiment.  FT4 could be used as the mode with the appropriate 
software.

Control operators would have to be present and the software would need some 
kind of periodic time out requiring operator input to continue, as well as 
being able to alert the control ops in case of problems and  governors to keep 
the program from running amok.

In the latter case, the software would need a driver for a klaxon.

Aside from the fact that virtually nobody likes this, is there any real reason 
not to do it?  Some regulatory issue not covered above?


73,Ken, AB1J
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>