To: | "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Most cost-effective sending of qsl's direct to qsl bureaus |
From: | Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com> |
Date: | Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:08:06 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I have stopped sending QSLs "en masse" to the Bureau about 5 years ago. I have noticed the inbound has dropped by 90% in the last couple of years. I do still send a small number to people who direct request to send that way or any inbound cards needing VT specifically for an award. 10 years ago I probably sent 1000 a year. Today its less than 100. Ed N1UR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Most cost-effective sending of qsl's direct to qsl bureaus via delivery services, Saulius Zalnerauskas |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Most cost-effective sending of qsl's, Lee Hiers |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Most cost-effective sending of qsl's, john |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] A tribute to K6AW by K8CX at Hamgallery, Tim Duffy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |