Hi Jukka
I think Mario was referring to something else: most contest QSOs actually do
not include full exchange (STN 1 de STN 2, RST....). In case when STN 2 is
responding to STN 1 who is running pile up, you usually only get STN 2
callsingn. If he/she for whatever reason did not get STN 1 call correct,
this is in most cases unknown to STN 2, who rarely sends you your own
callsign, yet you get penalized for his error.
Being one of those who increases the speed as the pile up grows, I share
Mario's concerns. If I ID every time, whoever is not sure of my call can
either ask me to repeat it or listen to the next QSO(s) and validate if he
copied it correctly.
73 Ivo I7/9A3A, 4U1GSC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jukka Klemola" <jpklemola@gmail.com>
To: "cq-contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rule Changes
..
CW sending errors are rare with the majority of PC TX. Russians are
wrong
penalizing me for all the variations of S56A immaginable!
I had a chat about this with Harry or Vlad.
The reason is you hear what the other station sends.
If he sends a strange variation of S56A it is _your_ responsibility to
get it right.
That is, you are responsible of delivering your call to the other log.
Yes .. he has a responsibility to copy it correct.
But that does not fully void your responsibility.
LP MMM S56A
73,
Jukka OH6LI
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|