CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Ethical question -- NIL?

To: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@me.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Ethical question -- NIL?
From: Ed Parish <k1ep.list@gmail.com>
Reply-to: k1ep@arrl.net
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 14:24:33 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I would change the K3EH Q to K3ES WPA, as he came back and corrected the
call for you.  The K9 will get a NIL, that's his fault.

Ed Parish, K1EP
k1ep@arrl.net

On Fri, Dec 12, 2025, 14:21 Jack Brindle via CQ-Contest <
cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:

> Art;
>
> Interesting scenario. I think I would leave it as X-QSO. That QSO does not
> have the 9-Lander’s call, so he should get a NIL. Even if you leave it as
> QSO, the K3’s QSO is also there, so the questionable Q should be ignored as
> a dupe. You should not get dinged for it, which usually means that for some
> strange reason you will. Just for safety, set it as X-QSO, but leave it in.
>
> It will be really interesting to see what the final verdict on it will be.
>
> 73,
> Jack, W6FB
>
> > On Dec 12, 2025, at 9:21 AM, Art Boyars <artboyars@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > ARRL 160M 'Test.  I call CQ and get multiple callers (Saturday night
> fresh
> > meat).  I dig out "K3", and I send "K3".  A K3 and some 9-land call
> answer.
> >
> > I dig out "K3E", and I send "K3E?".  A K3 and a 9-lander answer.
> >
> > I dig out "K3EH" (I think; close enough -- if I'm wrong, he can fix it),
> > and I send him a report.
> >
> > The calling station sends me "5NN IL" and does not correct the K3EH call
> > sign.
> > Illinois?  No problem; lots of people in non-natural QTHs these days.  I
> > log it, and do a quick "ready for the next caller", hoping the 9-land
> > caller is still there.
> >
> > Instead, K3ES calls in.  "5NN WPA".
> >
> > Hmmm.  So, who gave me 5NN IL??
> > QRZ.com shows K3EH in Florida.  K3EH has no scores posted on
> 3830scores.com.
> >
> > I think it was that over-persistent 9-land call.  If I leave it in my
> log,
> > I'll get dinged for a busted callsign.  So I change it to X-QSO.
> >
> > But wait a minute.  I'll lose the QSO -- and it's his fault -- but the
> > 9-lander call might still get credit for it, which I believe he does
> > not deserve.  (Some say the log checking software might not credit him.)
> >
> > I still have time to delete the QSO from my log and to resubmit.
> >
> > What do you think I should do?  I do not promise to accept your advice.
> >
> > 73, Art K3KU
> >
> >
> >
> > <
> http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
> >
> > Virus-free.www.avg.com
> > <
> http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
> >
> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>