To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened |
From: | "Remigijus Vaičius" <r.vaicius@ando.lt> |
Date: | Sun, 2 Feb 2014 14:31:14 +0200 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Well, this is not the last think in the contest. But I think time "regulation" will be more realistic - lets say you must to ID once per minute. It could be around 4 QSOs in CW and around 8 QSOs on SSB. This is what I am doing when I am lucky to have such number of callers :) I think more important could be the return of the 10 minutes rule for the Multi-One teams to work a multipliers on the other band and not a regular stations. 73, Remi LY8O ***************** -- XII. A. Unsportsmanlike Conduct: Examples of unsportsmanlike conduct include, but are not limited to: ... 6. Running stations making more than 3 contacts without sending their callsign. unqt --- Thanks to the CQ WPX Contest Commitee. 73, Vlad VE3IAE -- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] what else is lost, David Gilbert |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] New EA (URE) Contest Web, EC1KR |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened, Doug Smith W9WI |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened, Mats Strandberg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |