CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory
From: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Reply-to: n2ic@arrl.net
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 07:54:09 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
This gets into the topic of a relatively new construct for CQWW - Overlay categories.

For example, the Classic overlay category - As long as you only used 1 radio and no spotting, then you can enter your score in the usual SOAB category AND you can enter your first 24 operating hours score in the Classic overlay category. A two-fer !

Maybe this is the answer to the M/M vs. M/2 debacle: M/M is the (main) category for both M/M and M/2, and M/2 is an overlay category withing M/M.

73,
Steve, N2IC

On 12/08/2015 02:57 AM, Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest wrote:
The thing is, in both cases the ops would be following the rules as the 
categories overlap.

Rudy N2WQ

Sent using a tiny keyboard.  Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate 
autocorrect.


On Dec 7, 2015, at 9:58 PM, Jorge Diez CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com> wrote:

So if you agree with that because within the rules they can send as M2 or MM we 
are very bad

So V47T or CR3OO would change for SOAB HP ASSISTED to win the plaque and this 
is ok for you?

73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
.

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>