CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth Rule was: Re: Suggestion for Cabril

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth Rule was: Re: Suggestion for Cabrillo -- and the phone skimmer, new idea
From: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 09:50:18 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Isn't 'excessive bandwidth' cheating? It is against the rules. Why wouldn't they 'outed' and be disqualified?

I'm sure after 10 people tell you your audio is terrible, you should get the message. 73
Tom W7WHY



On 4/10/2015 10:52 AM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
I have never understood thought process behind not publicly "outing" the offenders. Most of them know they have crappy or very wide audio. They do it on purpose.

The best medicine would to pass these lousy signals by but people won't because they have to have that one contact, at least tell them their audio is lousy and you hope that nobody reports them, ahem.....

Mike W0MU

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>