No, but you now have asked Sean regarding board action on the 
proposed rules change, and he's a person who should know.
I was simply explaining how League governance typically works, since 
you had asked "Why it requires a decision at that level." In my 
experience the board has voted by e-mail or teleconference on a few 
occasions, but this is the exception, and that wasn't the question 
you raised anyway. Your ARRL director or perhaps Pres Craigie or EVP 
Dave Sumner can address this governance issue far better than I could.
But, I don't have a dog in this hunt.
73, Rick, WW1ME
*From:*Pete Smith N4ZR [mailto:n4zr@contesting.com]
*Sent:* Friday, January 25, 2013 3:54 PM
*To:* Rick Lindquist, WW1ME
*Cc:* CQ Contest; Kutzko, Sean, KX9X
*Subject:* Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted
Rick, I'm well aware of that, which is why I contacted Directors who 
contest, to try to get the issue before the Board. My question really 
goes to why the question has to wait for a semi-annual Board meeting, 
when a Board committee could vote on such minor matters by e-mail "as 
needed."  You seem to be well patched in - do you know what they 
decided, if anything?
On second thought, I'm copying Sean - he should know.
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
On 1/25/2013 12:00 PM, Rick Lindquist, WW1ME wrote:
    Pete, the CAC is what it says - "advisory." It's also comprised of
    volunteers. The CAC reports its findings and recommendations to 
the Board of
    Directors, and the board decides (or not). This puts the 
decision-making in
    the hands of individuals who have been elected by the ARRL 
membership.
    73, Rick, WW1ME
    -----Original Message-----
    From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On 
Behalf Of
    Pete Smith N4ZR
    Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:32 AM
    To:cq-contest@contesting.com <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
    Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted
    What Rich says is correct.  I would just add that the ARRL 10 and 
160
    contests are severely anachronistic in this respect.  Nobody is 
suggesting
    that assistance be allowed for "pure" single-ops, but surely 
there should be
    a SOA category in these contests. That there is not dates back to 
the
    earliest days of DX clusters.  To my knowledge, nobody has 
advanced a reason
    for keeping the status quo.
    I have been in correspondence with the CAC and various directors 
about this,
    and one told me that action might be taken in the January ARRL Board
    meeting, which has just taken place.  Why it requires a decision 
at that
    level is beyond me, but that's what we have.  Now waiting for 
detailed
    minutes to learn what, if anything, was done.
    73, Pete N4ZR
    Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
    http://reversebeacon.net,
    blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
    For spots, please go to your favorite
    ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
    On 1/25/2013 8:51 AM, Richard DiDonna NN3W wrote:
        Usually if it says nothing, the assumption is that you must 
classify
    yourself as multi-single as the single operator rules have 
language about
    the -operator- doing all of the activity.
        ARRL 160 and ARRL 10 do not have separate assisted categories -
    necessitating that assisted ops enter as multi single entries.
        73 Rich NN3W
        Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
        ----- Reply message -----
        From:Ktfrog007@aol.com  <mailto:Ktfrog007@aol.com>
        Date: Fri, Jan 25, 2013 7:30 am
        Subject: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted
        To:<cq-contest@contesting.com> 
<mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
        If a contest's rules say nothing about Assisted operation, 
does that
        mean it's allowed without restriction?
        Note that Single-Op has no uniform definition.  For example, 
in the
        ARRL RTTY Roundup, Single-Ops cannot be Assisted, while in 
the CQ WPX
        RTTY everyone can operate Assisted.
        73,
        Kermit (Ken) AB1J
        _______________________________________________
        CQ-Contest mailing list
        CQ-Contest@contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
        http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
        _______________________________________________
        CQ-Contest mailing list
        CQ-Contest@contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
        http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
    _______________________________________________
    CQ-Contest mailing list
    CQ-Contest@contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
    http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest