CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SS and CW contesting

To: n2ic@arrl.net, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS and CW contesting
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 11:55:07 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
This IS  something very interesting actually,
If you look at my rate graph, That Bump you see at 20:00Z?
That was a simple change of going from the typical ~30/35 WPM,

to only ~16/18 WPM.

It felt terrible at first, Kind of like when you get off the expressway after driving 75 for 8 hours to go to a regular road at 60 feels like you are crawling.  But the QSO rate JUMPED a LOT!

Probably all those that can not copy the 30+ wpm.  hmmmmm?

Joe W9ET/WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 11/9/2017 10:19 AM, Steve London wrote:
I have listened to recordings of SS from the 60's and 70's. What strikes me is how much slower CW speeds were then. You needed to troll in all of those newly-hatched General's, who could copy only slightly more than 13 WPM. Obviously, this slowed the rate on Saturday, leaving many more QSO's to be made on Sunday. If you tried running at 35 WPM, you would quickly run out of QSO's.

Fast forward to today. With very few slow speed contesters out there, we are working each other at 30-40 WPM, with high rates. No one left to work on Sunday.

As a datapoint, the 1968 winner of SS CW was KV4FZ, with 1000 QSO's. The QST writeup has some interesting photos - WA5LES (now K5RC), K5YAA (still K5YAA !), WA5RTG (now K5GO), WA2CLQ (now K1ZM).

73,
Steve, N2IC

On 11/09/2017 08:18 AM, Bill via CQ-Contest wrote:
It has now been 10 years since the US went code-free and ham radio license numbers are at ALL TIME highs - 750K total, half are general and extra that have HF privileges. 30K new techs a year, 10K upgrades a year from tech to general/extra. The problem for CW contesting is the number of hams that can copy code at 20+ WPM is decreasing and will continue to do so. New hams are on SSB/FM/digital. Look at the FT8 band segments on a bandscope. Look at the QSO totals in the RTTY contests. Read QST. And MOST importantly look at the
checks in the last SS.

Looking at the number of submitted logs for a contest doesn't indicate how the contest is doing, because it is now so easy to submit a log via web page copy and paste. A good indication is for all the ops that put in 22+ hours last weekend to ask themselves if they HAD fun and if they look forward to putting in 22+ hours next year? Did they feel like they couldn't wait for it
to end? Were they squirming in their chair the last few hours?

The only significant major contest scoring change I can think of in the last 45 years is WPX getting rid of zero point Q's. That's when I started entering the WPX. There needs to be some changes in the SS for those of us that still operate CW contests. Only 54 stations reported on 3830 operating 24 hours. In 2010 there were 125 stations. I don't see anything positive in that trend.

73, Bill KO7SS  (47 years operating CWSS)
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest





---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>