ZL2TZE added:
> Look at the REPLY address when making a reply in THIS FORUM !!! all
> REPLIES
> go to the SENDER of the message you are
> replying to and also I note that any message with anything but TEXT in it
> doesn't get through .. PYPHON rulz :-(
>
> Make sure that you check the reply address and send TEXT only !!!
I receive the digest, which does not have a reply-to header - so replies
to that rely on the poster's mail client using the address of the sender
of the digest.
My guess is that those who do not receive the digest receive something
that contains a reply-to header that has the list & the original
poster's address in it. I say that because sometimes I get replies from
folks to my posts here & sometimes their reply does not appear on the
list (but I see what they had tried to post as it was also directly
addressed to me). I rather doubt that every single time, every single
person hits the reply-to-all button.
No HTML to be seen in any of those messages - instead the only
explanation I can think of is that the censors censored that person's
post. The last time that happened was when I pointed out that maybe
there was abuse of CEPT in contests & I found it amusing that the
censors stopped a reply by a prolific participant here that seemed to
indicate he thought the oft-mentioned "boy & his radio" does not need
any licence or authorization to operate.
If this post is also censored, then everyone I added to the distribution
will know it happened. Usually, only the poster knows because like a CQ
WW entry, it vanishes from the results. On rare occasions, the censors
even say something about it to the censored. Maybe VE5RA & N4XM would
be so kind & let us know if they thought their missing posts could be
due to ZL2TZE's suggested reply-to or embedded HTML issues.
73, ex-VR2BG/p.
> -------Original Message-------
>
> From: N4XM Paul D. Schrader
> Date: 09/30/11 14:53:46
> To: vr2bg@harts.org.hk; ":"@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CAC ..... was "radio-sport.net web site or, copy
> and paste journalism
>
> You are correct. I have had submissions to the reflector blocked.
> And have been ignored at ARRL and CQ at times.
>
> Paul N4XM
>
> At 03:37 AM 9/25/2011 +0000, you wrote:
>> W5OV said:
>>
>>> We have forums like CQ Contest and others where the public can express
>>> their
>>> opinions freely - and they (we) do.
>>
>> Absolutely not true.
>>
>> Somebody controls what can be said on cq-contest & as just noted by
>> E73M, sounds like posts are still disappearing like entries in CQ WW
>> results.
>>
>> And there is nothing else like cq-contest that I am aware of.
>>
>> As a whole, the way things in amateur radio (not just radiosport) are
>> done is quite authoritarian & will be familiar to anyone unfortunate to
>> live where that is how things are done. We are to know what we are
>> told, who decides this & everything else is not us & they do so from
>> some distance from those they rule over - a model for going about things
>> that man improved upon centuries ago.
>>
>> (AR) [didahdidahdit], ex-VR2BG/p.
>>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|