Being log checker for some local events, after publishing results and
sending UBNs, I often get complains from some operators why I removed
them some N-I-L contacts, with audio recordings attached. Those
recordings prove that contacts were actually made, but contacts were
missing in the log. What should I do? To add those contacts into
correspodent's log to confirm contacts? IMHO, we should judge on what is
logged in correspodent's log and not by recordings.
OTOH, in EUHFC we often got recordings which prove that rumours on
someone's cheating are true and we are grateful to those who provided us
additional proofs of cheating.
73 Mirko, S57AD
Jimk8mr@aol.com pravi:
> In a message dated 12/14/2007 7:22:19 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> n4zr@contesting.com writes:
>
> There's simply no reason not to require serious contenders for the top ten
> boxes to record their efforts.
>
>
> ****************************************
>
>
> And having done so, we will then get excited about whether they will use
> those recordings to review questionable qsos, bringing about another whole
> round
> of "cheating" discussions. :>)
>
>
>
> 73 - Jim K8MR
>
>
>
>
> **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
> (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|