Jim:
Thanks for the compliment to my mental capacity. It's is great to have
it acknowledged publicly.
I've only seen FT8 working with an operator clicking and calling
stations, or having others call his station after he calls CQ.
But, he, and several othres around SW Michigan say that the new version
of FT8 has already been set up as a robot, and can operate with the
control operator in another part of the shack doing other things.
Again, I've not used either the original version nor the new version of
FT8, so my info is 2nd hand.
However, the day is approaching when all functions of a RTTY, CW, PSK31,
FT8, etc. stations can and will be able to be controlled by robots. At
that point we'll have a "Zero Operator", or as another operator prefers
"Sysop Control" category in contests. Whether the people who set up the
contest will recognize such an entry, or relegate it to the bit bucket
or check log category is yet to be determined.
/s/ The Idiot LID (as several others have said, and of which I freely admit)
72/73 de n8xx Hg
QRP >99.44% of the time
On 12/17/2018 8:23 AM, cq-contest-request@contesting.com wrote:
Message: 2 Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 10:59:33 -0800 From: Jim Brown
<k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> To: cq-contest@contesting.com Subject:
Re: [CQ-Contest] Using FT8 in RTTY Contests Message-ID:
<15aa3189-11ae-c5e2-fa9f-8b880768ff60@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On 12/16/2018
7:07 AM, Hank Greeb wrote:
One could always rig up several rigs to run FT-8 as a robot,
Your ignorance of how FT8 works is showing.
73, Jim K9YC
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|