| To: | "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beat ? Not everybody does ! |
| From: | jpescatore--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
| Reply-to: | "jpescatore@aol.com" <jpescatore@aol.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Dec 2025 13:16:47 +0000 (UTC) |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
160M and/or 10m contests with poor conditions are good examples of why you need to add item 5 to your list: 5. Often two running stations are sharing the same 500 hz window. They can't hear each other (or are just fighting for the freq) but others can hear both. Often a source of NILs for the running station, for the S&Per with wide enough filters, this can lead to a twofer QSO when both respond to you and both ack. 73 John K3TN _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Ham Radio in the Future, Richard F DiDonna NN3W |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beat ? Not everybody does !, ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beat ? Not everybody does !, Jim Brown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beat ? Not everybody does !, ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |