CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Recording the contest - unintended consequences

To: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Recording the contest - unintended consequences
From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k-zero-hb@earthlink.net
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:24:41 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
[tongueincheek]

Ya know, now that you bring it up, I've often wondered if those guys with
>1% UBN's weren't maybe recording their weekend so they could spruce things
up a bit before submitting!  

[/tongueincheek]

73, de Hans, K0HB
--
"5.13.2(p) Everything not specifically prohibited is mandatory."

 ><{{{{*>    http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb   


>
> To be honest with you, I can see as much room for contesting abuse in 
> self-recording as those who don't self record but snipe packet spots. 
Since 
> everyone will now be required to self record, expect those with less than 
> stellar ethics standards to start now having nearly perfect UBN reports. 
> They will now have a full replay of they contest, and will now replay
their 
> audio files 3 or 4 times to ensure every call was copied correctly.
>


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>