On 12/3/2018 10:22 AM, Wayne, W5XD wrote:
ARRL has added WSJT-X as an allowable mode for next month's RTTY Round
Up. I am daring to speak from ignorance (I have yet to make a single FT8
QSO) but will ask anyway whether this is a "good idea."
Your post indicates ignorance of how modes like FT8 work. I suggest that
you install WSJT-X and make some QSOs before making rash statements like
this based on hearsay. It might interest you to know that some first
rate contesters and DXers are active using FT8. I use it extensively on
6M. One of those promoting FT8 for contesting is W0YK. FT8 is close to
replacing RTTY for DXpeditions. Top CW ops like AA7A, AA7JV, and K6MM
were among those who did a lot of FT8 from KH1, and more top CW ops did
the same from VP6D. AA7JV appreciated the ability of FT8 to put EU
stations in the log at signal levels 10 dB below where CW works.
Modern contesting makes extensive use of computer software and hardware.
I have yet to meet anyone who can copy RTTY in their head or generate by
hand. All the CW that most of us send in a contest is computer
generated. The computer checks for dupes, presents us with a list of
calls to choose from when we start to enter one. The computer puts the
calls it sees from its RTTY decoder into a stack, from which we can
automatically work the one at the top. We can initiate a QSO by clicking
on a call on the screen. CW and RTTY skimmers fill our bandmaps with
calls, highlighted by color to tell us whether they're workable and
their multiplier value. In contests like CQWW, the computer fills in the
exchange -- all the human does is copy the call.
I am among the many OTs who started contesting in the '50s with a bug,
two ears, paper logs and paper dupe sheets. I wonder if any of those
purists who look down on modes like FT8 still do that.
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|