It shouldn't be too hard, then, to use AI to not only recognize callsigns and
the exchange but also to respond to it with a voice synthesizer and to log the
information. We could completely automate SSB contesting, something like QST
envisioned in their 1980s satirical piece "Have to find myself a hobby."
73 John AF5CC
Sent using {0}
---- On Mon, 04 Nov 2024 09:26:09 -0600 K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
wrote ---
I can think of at least two possible paths forward.
(1) Apple's Siri, Amazon's Alexa, and Google's Assistant (there are others)
are very good at understanding what I say, as well as what visitors with
various accents say. With proper legal rights to one of these, or to a
similar program, probably little new technology is needed for an SSB RBN
although development would be non-trivial and might be limited to use of an
approved list of phonetics.
(2) Digital voice -- which is more spectrum efficient and clearer -- might
be easier to decode for RBN purposes.
73, Dave K3ZJ
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 7:35 AM <mailto:info@bokverket.com> wrote:
> "IMHO, using AI in it's current state to try and catch these is overkill."
>
> I do hope that most readers of this group realized that my suggesting using
> AI do decode SSB calls on RBN was not meant to combat the few instances of
> spam. Rather, to point out that AI could probably accomplish what RBN has
> done for CW contesting and non-contesting.
>
> Whether this is a step forward och backward is in the ears of the receiver
> :-)
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Goran, SM0DRD
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|