I could not agree more. I have even placed a direct link to LOTW on my web
page.
Now if I could just get someone in North Dakota to upload their contest logs
I would have CW WAS via LOTW to go along with my DXCC CW via LOTW.
To quote Ward, N0AX, 75,000,000 QSLs can't be wrong !
73
MAL
N7MAL
BULLHEAD CITY, AZ
http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm
http://geocities.com/n7mal/
Don't worry about the world coming to an end today.
It's already tomorrow in Australia
----- Original Message -----
From: Claudio Astorri
To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 19:57
Subject: [CQ-Contest] LOTW and WAS...
Dear Contesters,
I am very impressed by LOTW (Logbook Of The World) by the ARRL.
Am using it for my DXCC endorsements and now also for my WAS ones.
Wonderful.
We discussed with some attitude about QSLing after our CONTESTing times.
Well, if more and more amateurs would make regular use of LOTW,
particularly
those "SASE or nothing" QSL policy guys, the problem in replying could be
much smaller.
I do not want to raise the QSL issue down.
Just to say... LOTW is a big help.
LOTW is not intuitive at beginning but it becomes something very easy
afterwards.
Very well spent time.
Now that WAS is fully functional into LOTW, do you agree with me that
CONTESTERS should consider it even more valuable than before?
Thanks.
Claudio Astorri, IK2DZN
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/359 - Release Date: 6/8/2006
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|