To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] AI for SSB RBN |
From: | Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com> |
Date: | Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:41:27 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I'm not super tekky, but I doubt that AI recognition of SSB callsigns is
likely on typical ham PCs.
73, Pete N4ZR On 11/4/2024 3:22 AM, info@bokverket.com wrote: "IMHO, using AI in it's current state to try and catch these is overkill."I do hope that most readers of this group realized that my suggesting using AI do decode SSB calls on RBN was not meant to combat the few instances of spam. Rather, to point out that AI could probably accomplish what RBN has done for CW contesting and non-contesting.Whether this is a step forward och backward is in the ears of the receiver :-)Sincerely, Goran, SM0DRD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] AI for SSB RBN, info |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] AI for SSB RBN, K3ZJ David Siddall |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] AI for SSB RBN, info |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] AI for SSB RBN, K3ZJ David Siddall |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |