Come on Paul... you mean you are going to argue that CW is not a digital
form of communication? One's and Zero's. Dits and Dahs? Off and On's? Make
and break?
And just because we train ourselves to interpret those data elements, it's
somehow a third kind of communication system? In 'my world', communication
is either analog or digital.
73 de Bob - NU1AW/Ø in MN
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
>
>> ... I consider a code reader, any code reader, including
>> those built in to WL and the many other available ones,
>> as exactly the same as a rtty demodulator,
>
> Sure they are - but only to those who believe that CW
> is just another data mode.
>
> The rest of us know better.
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|