| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs - killing Innovation |
| From: | "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net> |
| Reply-to: | sawyered@earthlink.net |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Mar 2017 17:36:16 -0400 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
If non-competitive participants are truly non-competitive, why do they care what class they are in or who else is in the class? Ed N1UR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs - killing Inovation, Tom Osborne |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Interleaving QSOs, Jamie WW3S |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] SurveyMonkey survey - In-band dual CQing/split operation, Bill Conwell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs - killing Innovation, Ed Sawyer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |