Accusations are most probably unfounded as OE4A must have been Multi Op I am
sure. After years of blatant cheating SO results from him would have zero
credibility anyway so does not make much sense to participate in this class.
The question of whether getting help from cluster to copy the call is
ethical is left open of course but in reality it is also very difficult
mentally not to use this info once you see it already...
73
Tonno
ES5TV
p.s. the only ES5 active in ARRL DX was ES5RR from my station, no ES5E call
assigned yet:)))
----- Original Message -----
From: <k4zw@comcast.net>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 3:01 AM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Life in the World of Packet
> Results of the 2005 CQ WW DX SSB Contest
> Disqualified: 9A4X - illegal operation in T9;
> OE4A (OE1EMS) - illegal use of packet
> spotting in the single operator category
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "I guess your "Hmmmmm" might very well be justified."
>
> you sure about that jim?!
>
> 73 de OE1EMS (OE4A in ARRL 2007 CW)
> Braco
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jan Erik Holm" <sm2ekm at telia.com>
> Cc: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Life in the World of Packet
>
>
>> As far as I remember OE4A got hit with packet cheating in
>> the CQWW a couple years ago.
>> I guess your "Hmmmmm" might very well be justified.
>>
>> 73 Jim SM2EKM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|