CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Bureau Reply for Multi-Multi DX Station ContestCards

To: <W5KI@aol.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Bureau Reply for Multi-Multi DX Station ContestCards
From: "JAMES HEADRICK" <W3CP@CHARTER.NET>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:33:12 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Steve, In my opinion you are not off-base. FWIW I only respond to cards that 
have an unmistakable request for my card.  Preemptive QSLing is an 
understandable solution for the QSL problem but should not have 'pse QSL' 
printed on the card unless all those replies are desired. 73, Jim  w3cp

> QUESTION:  Most cards are clear:  PSE QSL.    But every few cards, the 
> same
> question hits:  Do those big DX Contest  club stations want my bureau 
> card?  Or
> are they helping us out,  but don't want one back?  The question arise
> because most of the nice,  full-color contest station cards say either: 
> (1)  TNX
> QSO & TNX  QSL (which I didn't send yet), or (2) they don't comment on the
> subject at all.
>
> BOTTOM LINE:  I am inclined to think that "TNX QSO & TNX  QSL" comments or 
> a
> lack of "PSE QSL" means "we don't need one  back".  Am I totally off-base 
> by
> not sending a card? >
>
> ************************************** See what's new at 
> http://www.aol.com
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>