| To: | amps <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] No parasitic choke question |
| From: | "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com> |
| Reply-to: | dezrat1242@yahoo.com |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:22:06 -0700 |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:40:34 -0700, Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net> wrote: >Interesting... What about a series low-pass instead right at the >cathode? It would have to handle the drive power, but wouldn't it reduce >the number of potential feedback paths? REPLY: I don't think it would reduce the impedance at the VHF parasitic frequency, if I understand you right. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Fillament choke, Dave M |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions, Bill, W6WRT |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] No parasitic choke question, Jim Barber |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] No parasitic choke question, Jim Barber |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |