Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Defining CCS

To: "'Steve Wright'" <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Defining CCS
From: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 19:36:32 +0100
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Steve,

Communication in this case means to communicate with the members of this
group.

I built several amps to be run ccs.

If IMD is nonsense try to run your rig at -10 IMD3 and have fun.

73
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Amps [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Steve Wright
Sent: Sonntag, 31. Dezember 2017 18:55
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Defining CCS

On 27/12/17 14:55, Charles Harpole wrote:
> It is helpful to hold to old established nomenclature for clear
> communication.

Helpful to who?  Communication by whom, of what, precisely? 

I find all this drivel about amp specs and IMD to be a lot of puritan
nonsense and waste of vertical whitespace.

Build something perhaps?  No?


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>