Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Shunt regulated high voltage psu

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Shunt regulated high voltage psu
From: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 10:00:58 -0800
There's been so much discussion on this, I can't resist:

Last time I built a tetrode amp I used a 4-1000A grid-driven and put +550V
on Ig2, provided by a stiff power supply that had no electronic regulation
whatever.  Just a 400V, 200mA transformer, full-wave bridge, ~160uF
filtering, and a 10k, 50W bleeder resistor dissipating 30W.  Eg2 never
varied by more than 1-2Vpk key up, key down, with modulation, without
modulation, whatever.  Seemed plenty stiff enough to me, and cost about $20
for the entire circuit, including the transformer.

Duh-?

WB2WIK/6

"Each success only buys an admission ticket to a more difficult problem." --
Henry Kissinger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rich [SMTP:2@mail.vcnet.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:55 AM
> To:   Steve Thompson; AMPS
> Subject:      Re: [AMPS] Shunt regulated high voltage psu
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: rich <2@mail.vcnet.com>
> >To: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@qsl.net>; AMPS <amps@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
> >Date: 30 January 2002 10:22
> >Subject: Re: [AMPS] Shunt regulated high voltage psu
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: rich <2@mail.vcnet.com>
> >>>To: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@qsl.net>; AMPS <amps@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
> >>>Date: 29 January 2002 22:03
> >>>Subject: Re: [AMPS] Shunt regulated high voltage psu
> >>>snip
> >>>>>There doesn't seem to be any real need for an active series element
> to
> >>>>>feed an active MOSFET shunt regulator. The loop gain in the shunt
> part
> >>>>>is already very high, so the series feed can be just a plain
> resistor.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Certainly, in that configuration. There's numerous valves where the
> >>>reverse
> >>>>>screen current appears to low or non-existent (4CX800 for example),
> >where
> >>>>>dumping 40+mA all the time in a shunt regulator feels wasteful.
> >>>>
> >>>>//   Low screen-V tubes such as the 4cx800 (350V-sc.) suffer more from
> >>>>reverse screen current than tetrodes with handles.   However, even
> >>>>4cx5000As and 4cx10,000s occasionally exhibit reverse screen current
> with
> >>>>1200 - 1500 V on the screen.  Bleeding 25mA seems to take care of the
> >>>>problem.
> >>>>
> >>>>>This led me
> >>>>>to look at series supplies, which led in turn to thoughts about
> effects
> >>>>>under fault conditions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>//  Did you look at the screen current curves for the 4cx800?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Certainly did. The Svetlana data sheet shows no areas of negative
> screen
> >>>current, even though the text discusses the need to cater for it.
> >>>
> >>//   It looks to me like there should be some more curves to the right
> of
> >>the 0 screen current line, like there are on the 4cx350 curves.
> >>Obviously, at times the 800 has negative screen current or they wouldn't
> >>have mentioned it.
> 
> >Possibly or probably - I'll find out when I fire one up (anyone out there
> >save me the bother?). 
> 
> //    If the 4cx800 does not exhibit reverse screen current, Svetlana 
> succeeded in defying the laws of physics.  
> 
> >They put -ve contours on the 4CX1600B so maybe they
> >just cut and pasted the text. Happens all the time - or did when I worked
> in
> >the semiconductor business. Anyhow, that's a digression. My guess is that
> >any -ve current is likely to be small, and normal operation appears to
> run
> >around 40mA +ve. It seemed to me to be wasteful dumping 40odd mA all the
> >time in a shunt just to meet peak demand so I designed a series circuit,
> >then got to thinking about protection which is where I came in.
> >
> //  I would use a means of sinking c. 15mA of reverse screen current to 
> prevent the screen from rising to the anode V and destroying the tube.  
> However, if you have a free source of 4cx800s, no such precaution is 
> needed. 
> 
> 
> cheers, Steve
> 
> -  R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K, 
> www.vcnet.com/measures.  
> end
> 
> 
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>