Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Re: 8171

To: "David G4FTC" <g4ftc@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Re: 8171
From: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:26:09 -0800
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>

On Jan 28, 2005, at 11:39 AM, David G4FTC wrote:


Hi Rich,

Most of your questions are answered in the following pages:

David -- I did not find a schematic of the grid circuitry.

http://www.qsl.net/g4ftc/amplifiers/8171/8171_circuit_description/ 8171_circuit_description.htm


http://www.qsl.net/g4ftc/amplifiers/8171/8171_construction/ 8171_construction.htm

http://www.qsl.net/g4ftc/amplifiers/8171/8171_testing/8171_testing.htm

The operating parameters are the same as my 8170 amp as per:

http://www.qsl.net/g4ftc/amplifiers/8170/8170_testing/8170_testing.htm


I have used both and I can not see why the SK300 should have less inductance than a SK-300A.

Firstly I must say that I?ve never actually had a SK300 in my hands ? it?s only my assumptions based on visually comparing the Svetlana SK300As (which I use) with the datasheet photos of the Eimac SK300.

The SK-300 is similar to the SK-300A except that it has much unneeded metal on the grid collets that restricts air flow. Relieving air restriction through a SF-300 requires disassembly, sawing the collets with a 32-tooth/inch coping saw, and reassembly.. Total elapsed time is c. 30-minutes.

(This is really where photos are required to accompany this text ? what I am trying to describe would then become self evident).


Looking at the filament connection side, the SK300 has 8 radial supports whereas the SK300A only has four. Also the SK300 skirt goes the full vertical length of the base, whereas on the SK300A this is reduced to zero except where the four radials are located, all of which are no doubt to improve airflow. Now my background is really VHF/UHF where all attempts are made to try and provide the shortest connections to ground to minimise inductance. To my way of thinking, the radial supports, which on the SK300A are about 2-1/2 inches long from the chassis to the outer filament ring, are less than ideal in assuring a good RF ground.

Agreed. Measuring screen self-resonance with a dip-meter will give a clue as to whether screen-grounding modification is needed for the band being used.

What I would like is a good quality photo of a SK360 base ? I have a scan of the Eimac datasheet but the detail in the photo isn?t sufficient to work out how it?s better at VHF than the SK300/300A.

The Eimac SK-330B is a VHF socket for the 8169. The grid contact is made with a short piece of fingerstock instead of with a 360º collet. My guess is that this was done to reduce total input C. The VHF version of the SK-300A might be similar?


cheerz


Regards

David G4FTC


_______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps



Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>