To: | w2xj@w2xj.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Why are we building amps rather then transmitters? (Tubes vs. Solid State) |
From: | Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 4 May 2012 16:06:36 -0500 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Good luck fixing it when it breaks. Or maybe you handle 100 pin chips a lot better than I do. I'm all for tx over amps, but I prefer vintage. Rob K5UJ On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:53 PM, W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com> wrote: > What is being proposed is more like a legal limit flex radio. SDR goes a > long way in helping to forestall obsolesce. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Antenna tuner loss, Rob Atkinson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Antenna tuner loss, Jim Barber |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Why are we building amps rather then transmitters? (Tubes vs. Solid State), Dan Mills |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Why are we building amps rather then transmitters? (Tubes vs. Solid State), Dan Mills |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |