To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] Re: |
From: | jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden) |
Date: | Tue, 19 May 98 09:58:52 -0500 |
>>> 2) Never met Ian, but the gut feeling grows that anyone who challenges him >>>in the area of network analysis or any fundamental EE stuff has a real good >>>chance of losing. Very respectable stuff, Ian - I appreciate it. > >However, adding a bit of X to make one's calculations come out more >favourably, undoubtedly gives one a leg up. The 200 nH is inductance for the anode lines to the blocking cap were a guess by Ian. So the inductance is less. It still doesn't change the mathematical principles. Also, as we have discussed recently, the job of the resistor is not to abosrb oscillations, but supress them. So wether the 100 Ohms is transformed to 1K or 100K by inductances makes no difference. The math still holds. 73, Jon KE9NA -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Ogden jono@webspun.com www.qsl.net/ke9na "A life lived in fear is a life half lived." -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] Re:, km1h@juno.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] Re: Parasitics, Jon Ogden |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] Re:, <kn6dv@contesting.com (Will KN6DV) |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] Re:, Rich Measures |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |