Svetlana, Taylor, you name it. Just go download them and look for yourself.
Scott
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
To: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>; "David Craig" <davidhcraig@verizon.net>;
<amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] SB200 on 6m & my take
> What spec sheets from what manufacturers?
>
> Please cite actual examples.
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "KB0NLY" <kb0nly@mchsi.com>
> To: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; "David Craig"
> <davidhcraig@verizon.net>; <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 11:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] SB200 on 6m & my take
>
>
>> Since all the spec sheets from all the manufacturers said so. They
>> hardly hold their own at 10m.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
>> To: "David Craig" <davidhcraig@verizon.net>; <amps@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 8:45 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Amps] SB200 on 6m & my take
>>
>>
>>> I'll be briefer. Since when isnt the 572B rated to 6M?
>>>
>>> Carl
>>> KM1H
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "David Craig" <davidhcraig@verizon.net>
>>> To: <amps@contesting.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 12:44 AM
>>> Subject: [Amps] SB200 on 6m & my take
>>>
>>>
>>>> Brief & to the point- they stink, monoband or (worse) tapped
>>>> bandswitch "models". They may be fine for the occassional SSB QSO
>>>> without pushing it, but otherwise they do one thing with regularity-
>>>> they die/burn out/self-destruct. RTTY? WSJT & other digicrap with
>>>> 100% duty cycle for 30-55 seconds key-down? Result? Be ready for a
>>>> buzz, hiss, POP & Boom & to buy a new amp, or parts that cost enough
>>>> $
>>>> to build a new one. I don't do any digital myself save cw but if
>>>> you
>>>> want a list of dead SB200 conversions (owned by others) I'll be
>>>> happy
>>>> to provide them, some were EME deaths & others that just "crapped
>>>> out"
>>>> due to tubes that aren't ment to be used at that QRG.
>>>> I don't care what you can "get away with", I want something that
>>>> isn't going to crap out because the tubes aren't rated for 50MHz
>>>> use.
>>>> SB200s should be left to HF. If you are still going to convert one,
>>>> do what I am doing and put a 3CPX800 in it with new cooling and a
>>>> new
>>>> FWB PS and appropriate transformer. Otherwise build one with an
>>>> appropriate tube/s from scratch which I have also done x 3. 572Bs
>>>> are
>>>> a lousy tube for 6m conversion unless your habit is to run it a few
>>>> hours per year.
>>>> Oh, one last thing- for parasitic suppressors, don't be lazy and
>>>> use the resistor leads as a soldering surface for the L (really a
>>>> "U")
>>>> between resistor sides on a 6m conversion. I have seen 4 cases so
>>>> far
>>>> of that method resulting in heat melting the "L" on the plate-block
>>>> side... ergo all B+ plus RF current passes thru the resistors &
>>>> softens the tubes in seconds. $600+ $ down the tubes.
>>>>
>>>> N3DB
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Amps mailing list
>>>> Amps@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Amps mailing list
>>> Amps@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.11/1997 - Release Date:
>> 03/12/09 10:38:00
>>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.13/1999 - Release Date: 03/13/09
05:59:00
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|