Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die?

To: amps@contesting.com, Charles Harpole <k4vud@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die?
From: Glen Zook <gzook@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:58:33 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
There are some kits available, usually fairly simple, but there are a couple 
complex ones out there.

But, Heath's "bread and butter" was NOT amateur radio although, for decades, 
amateur radio equipment was very profitable.  Heath sold many thousands of test 
equipment, "hi-fi" equipment, and so forth.

Like it or not, amateur radio operators are a VERY small market when compared 
to consumer items.  Then "figure in" the actual number of operators who really 
would build kits if they were available.  Frankly, the economics are just not 
there!  The companies who are manufacturing kits today are generally doing so 
as a "side line" and are not showing a large profit.

Next, we live in a society today that is very prone to "suing" someone if 
things don't go right or if they are injured in any way.  Frankly, someone 
today building an amplifier kit with lethal voltages present is an open 
invitation to a very large lawsuit.  If liability insurance is available, the 
cost of such insurance is going to increase the cost of the kit substantially.  
Back when Heath was in its "hey day" if someone got shocked they figured out 
why and tried not to get shocked again.  Today, if someone gets shocked, or 
worse, then the lawsuits start.  It seems if the lawsuits include the 
manufacturer of the device, the electric company that provides the electricity, 
the manufacturer of the wire that conducted the electricity, the mine owner who 
owned the mine from which the copper that was used in the wire came from, and 
anyone else who is remotely a party.

I definitely would like to see a "new" Heathkit type of company.  But, 
realistically, it just isn't going to happen.  At least on a scale that is even 
a fraction of what Heath produced.

Glen, K9STH

Website:  http://k9sth.com


--- On Sun, 1/31/10, Charles Harpole <k4vud@hotmail.com> wrote:
 
Sorry, but I do not accept the answers to why there are no more ham Heathkits, 
at least today.
 
Today, hams are hungry for a safe and sure building projects which 1. includes 
all all all the parts, 2. has good instructions in English, and 3 results in 
something one would want.  Elecraft may be partial proof of the consumer kit 
choices.
 
Power supplies and RF amplifiers could be the items a person would want and 
would be willing to build.  Maybe add SWR meters, Keyers, advanced speaker 
enclosures, remote touch pad for several rigs (K3 etc), and remote antenna 
switches?

I get a laugh at the building projects in QST over the last few years.... Who 
in the world actually builds these things?  It looks to me like ARRL wants to 
continue the idea, now a myth, that hams are overall very technically adept and 
cutting edge regardless of if the articles are actually built by anybody.  
 
To me, ham radio as a hobby today is much like the old car guys... Model T, 
etc.  Add old airplanes, or add your favorite.  These are old technology played 
with for fun and celebrated for what it is... a beautiful and wonderful part of 
history.  CW is the same thing, the practice of an elegant old communications 
method.  No one puts down a guy with a beautifully restored Model T Ford, and 
hams should NOT stand being put down just because our technology does not 
nearly equal what the military has, for example.  
 
We should accept and celebrate the kind of radio hams do.   The return of 
point-to-point wiring!  Hurray!  Bring back kits!


      
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>