Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum?

To: Robert Groh <rgroh@swbell.net>, amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum?
From: Radio WC6W <wc6w_amps@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Hi Bob,
  Per the Jennings catalog, vacuum variables should be shipped at min. C.

73 & Good afternoon,
  Marv WC6W 

http://wc6w.50webs.com/

--- On Wed, 6/10/09, Robert Groh <rgroh@swbell.net> wrote:

> From: Robert Groh <rgroh@swbell.net>
> Subject: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum?
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 7:59 AM
> Getting set to sell off some vacuum
> variables and I have a question: when I ship them, should I
> set them at minimum capacity setting or at maximum
> capacity?  
> 
> I would think the answer is to ship with the capacitor set
> at it's minimum capacity - the 'rotor' would be retracted
> the most and the 'mechanical lever arm' (i.e. the length of
> the unsupported mass of the 'rotor') would, therefore, be at
> it's minimum.
> 
> Comments and advice welcome. The vacuum variables are
> Jennings UCS and UCSL, by the way, if that matters.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 73
> Bob Groh, WA2CKY
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> 


      
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>