| To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside? |
| From: | Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick) |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Aug 1999 17:34:08 +0100 |
>? the dip you see with a dipmeter coupled to a Pi-network is not on the >operating frequency. Now there's a new definition that's not in any of the textbooks............not a very scientific one either, if I may so, Rich. 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | R: R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, <i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures |
| Previous by Thread: | R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures |
| Next by Thread: | R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |