Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] slam tally

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] slam tally
From: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 12:50:32 +0100

Rich says;

        >?  Would you consider it bad form to state that alleged facts were 
        >contradicted by the personnel dept. of the former employer?

Rebuttal of facts is an accepted part of debate. To say that evidence is
available to rebut a set of facts stated by one of the parties, and to
produce that evidence is one thing - and is acceptable: but if one said that
'these facts presented by Mr. X are lies and I'm going to prove it', I'd
class that not only as unacceptable, but purposely inflammatory and
insulting.


73

        Peter G3RZP

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>