To: | Tom Cathey <K1JJ@comcast.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Designing the Cleanest Linear with RF Negative Feedback |
From: | Vic K2VCO <vic@rakefet.com> |
Date: | Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:32:38 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Tom Cathey wrote: > If a local > is S9+50 over, even if he is 50db down 5kc away, that is still going to > cover an S3 DX station. And, if the quality is worse, the window gets pretty > tough to use. As a CW operator, I don't have to contend with wide SSB signals. But a big problem with strong local signals, both CW and SSB, is phase noise generated in the low level exciter stages. I suggest that you buy up all of the IC706's and similar rigs in the neighborhood! -- 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA http://www.qsl.net/k2vco _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Designing the Cleanest Linear with RF Negative Feedback, Tom Cathey |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Designing the Cleanest Linear with RF Negative Feedback, wc6w@juno.com |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Designing the Cleanest Linear with RF Negative Feedback, Tom Cathey |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Designing the Cleanest Linear with RF Negative Feedback, wc6w@juno.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |