I was thinking maybe 6 would get him 400 watts without pushing the tubes way
past their ratings. They will be anyhow, but I wouldn't use over say +900 Vdc
on the plates. That's still a good bit over the recommended maximum. You get up
over 1 kV and bad things can happen. One has to remember those tubes have a
maximum dissapation rating too. Over that and they'll cherry up. When they do,
they'll be ruined. Most of those small glass tube like the 6146 and sweep tubes
would drastically reduce their emission every time that anode would get red.
Also, it's according to how he will run them, either grid driven or G-G. You'll
get more out of them without burning them out running them grid driven. A few
watts will open them up this way. G-G will need a good amount of drive for 6
tubes.
Best,
Will
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 8/10/05 at 1:45 PM Karl-Arne Markström wrote:
>Without grossly abusing the 6146's, you cannot expect more than
>about 250 W PEP output from four 6146 tubes.
>
>The reason that sweep tubes can give more power is that
>they have very large peak emission capabilities.
>
>Peak emission in a 6146 is in the order of 700 mA, but i.a. the 6LQ6
>was rated for about 1,2 A peak emission.
>
>To get 400W PEP, using a reasonable plate voltage,
>out of parallelled small glass transmitting tubes would require 4 or 6 of
>the TT21 class tetrodes
>(as frequently done in small ship's radio equipment during the 70's).
>
>If you try this concept, it would be preferred to run the 6146's at a
>higher plate voltage
>rather to stretch the cathode current ratings.
>
>73/
>
>Karl-Arne
>SM0AOM
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Tom Bowman" <wa3rey@comcast.net>
>To: <amps@contesting.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 12:54 PM
>Subject: [Amps] TV sweep tubes and 6146s
>
>
>> What is the reason amplifiers never seem to be designed using four
>> 6146s instead of TV sweep tubes like for example, four 6KD6s?
>> I must be missing something obvious here.
>>
>> I'm asking because I'm thinking of building a 400W or so PEP amplifier
>> for 75 and 40 meters.
>>
>> Keeping cost really low is one of my goals here and I have several good
>> 6146s in the junk box.
>>
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Tom, WA3REY
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>> Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.5/67 - Release Date: 2005-08-09
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.5/67 - Release Date: 2005-08-09
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|