Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] New AMP Pix

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] New AMP Pix
From: w7iuv@axtek.com (Larry Molitor)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 23:35:45 +0000
At 10:36 AM 12/10/99 -0700, measures wrote:
>>
>>Lee, NT6D, has sent in a few shots of his 2 x 8877 amp.
>
>?  Editorial:  Building a 2, 8877 amplifier puzzles me.  2, 8877s incurs 
>more tube cost than a single 8171 .  8877s require a higher-pressure, 
>noisier blower.  A pair can do up to 5 out.  The 8171 can do 5db better - 
>if need be, of course.  Not only does it have nifty handles,  it is far 
>more rugged than an 8877.  Instant-on is good.  .  .  .  .  .  

>-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
> 

Rich,

Even building a single 8877 has always puzzeled me. But then, each to his
own.....

73,

Larry - W7IUV
w7iuv@arrl.net
http://www.axtek.com/w7iuv
Amp pix at http://207.108.137.61



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>