To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] SWR and line length, etc. |
From: | measures@vcnet.com (measures) |
Date: | Tue, 5 Oct 1999 01:09:22 -0700 |
>measures wrote: > >>>>> I think that the indicated SWR minimum will always correspond to zero >>>>> reactance. >>> >>>No, that's not correct necessarily. A 100 Ohm termination used in a 50 >>>Ohm system has no reactive components. Adding a 1/8 wavelength of 50 Ohm >>>transmission line will make that 100 Ohm real load look purely reactive. >> >>? Weird Science. > >How is that Weird Sceince, O Great One? > ? My name is Richard or Rich... // Because a purely reactive resistance has zero resistance, Jon. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] Re: The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz., measures |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz., measures |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] SWR and line length, etc., measures |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] SWR and line length, etc., Roger D. Johnson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |