To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] AL1200 |
From: | km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com) |
Date: | Wed, 23 Sep 1998 19:15:40 -0400 |
Mark and Peter...tnx for the info but meeting FCC specs was never one of the reasons given to me. Interpeting FCC specs has been a sore point with several manufacturers since a lot of interpetation latitude is given to local jurisdiction offices. Ameritron can disable 10M with a 30 second to cut green wire....others have to jump thru hoops to get approval. Maybe Im missing something but I fail to see any difference in the ability to attenuate harmonics on 160/80 than 40/20 or other bands. Alpha and B&W at least used the Pi-L on all bands and pushed the harmonic attenuation feature....on the higher bands which tend to annoy TV sets. I was told at one point it was to save on variable capacitor cost; later it was called efficiency. ( Different Ameritron engineers over a period of time from Toledo to the MFJ Mississsippi swamp pits) With the cost of an extra switch wafer in todays market I wonder....? Perhaps it is all the above....the Q is so poor on the lower bands they had to add a L section to compensate for harmonics.....??? Comments?? 73 Carl KM1H On Wed, 23 Sep 1998 15:47:16 EDT wb8jkr@juno.com writes: > Carl, would it be possible that a Pi-L is used >because of the closer frequency spacing of >the 160-80 meter bands they thought the >better harmonic attenuation would be advantageous? > >Mark WB8JKR > > >>I guess I'm an old fashioned type Bill. Never been on RTTY and pbly >>never >>will so I just tend to ignore the mode! I never could get a straight >>answer why Ameritron uses a Pi-L on 80-160M. One "expert" claimed it >>was to improve efficiency. If so he neglected to >>transfer that new found efficiency out to the load. >>Glad to hear about the 91b...I hear praises also but have only been >>inside one once. >> >>73 Carl KM1H >>_____________________________________________________________________ > >>You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. >Get >>completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Or call Juno >>at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] -- FAQ on WWW: >>http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: >>amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: >>amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: >>owner-amps@contesting.com Search: >>http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm _____________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] AL1200, Bill Turner, W7TI |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] PL-172 as GG Triode?, km1h@juno.com |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] AL1200, Bill Turner, W7TI |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] AL1200, zeitler@ibm.net |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |