To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] SB 220 vice SB221 |
From: | km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com) |
Date: | Sun, 23 Nov 1997 19:44:40 EST |
No need to repeat the long stuff from Steve but I feel that he made a few points that I think are wrong. 1. Once a sustained arc occurs in the Tune cap or across the bandswitch it becomes a very wideband signal source and of course it will be heard all over the spectrum. It is called a spark gap. However that arc is not a parasitic. It MAY have been started by the parasitic or something entirely else. 2. A true parasitic will take place with the amp terminated in a perfect 50 Ohm load...DC to light...since it never gets past the tank circuit in the first place. Try it yourself; drive the pi-net from either direction with a 120-200MHz signal and see what comes out the other end. 3. What you see in the SB-220 and many other amps is what I call a secondary reasonant circuit formed by the shorted turn effect of the tank coil - bandswitch combination. Stray C and L set up this massive secondary potential that is just looking for a path to dissapate thru. In many cases you can de-Q this circuit by placing a low value HV snubber cap across the bandswitch contacts. I have found 10-15pf to be sufficient and across the 40-20M contacts right at the switch. Other amps with shorting or non-shorting switches will require different cap placement but I have yet to find a combination that does not work. The snubber will affect tuning a bit on the highest bands so it does require a Tune cap with sufficient minimum C to compensate on 10M....the SB-220 cap is OK. I may not have all the terminology correct since "I aint no durn injuneer" but I do feel that the basic idea is correct. I have run SB-220's with the wide spaced tune cap and an experimental plate xfmr at power levels of 1500-1800W with nary a trace of arcs once the snubber is installed. This also assumes that the parasitic suppressors are replaced with improved versions since those original 2W carbons just cant take the 10-15M RF at those power levels. 73 Carl KM1H -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Fw: [AMPS] SB220/SB221, KN6DV |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] SB 220 vice SB221, Steve Harrison |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] SB 220 vice SB221, Steve Harrison |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] SB 220 vice SB221, w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |