Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] HV MOSFETs for RF

To: <amps@contesting.com>, Jim Thomson <jim.thom@telus.net>
Subject: Re: [Amps] HV MOSFETs for RF
From: Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net>
Reply-to: Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 14:31:56 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
"Problem is, the typical –140 db MDS of today's xcvrs is rendered useless, 
since the noise floor in urban areas is way higher than that."

Yes, this is why those of us in rural areas need an amp more than we need 
better antennas.  We can hear the 100 watt signal from the urban hams no 
problem, but they can't hear us. Going to 500 - 1000 watts solves that problem.

"Same deal with astronomy + light pollution.    I gave up on that a while back. 
 If you cant even see the milky way from your own back yard, throw in the 
towel, you are wasting your time."

Or you can go the CCD camera route.  Modern CCDs and image stacking can produce 
amazing images from light-polluted areas.  Unfortunately I have not found any 
ham-radio equivalent that can solve interference problems at the receiver 
instead of at the source of the in-band interference.

"If I point it at say VK land,  I'm also pointed right at a source of  noise.  
Ditto with every other direction."

I have that problem on 2 meter weak-signal.  My greatest noise source, by far, 
is the city of Boston, even though it's a good 180 miles away.  It's obvious 
when the rotor turns the antenna through that bearing. But that's also the 
direction where ham stations are most likely to be found.  Receive F/B doesn't 
help if the signal and the noise are coming from the same direction.

73,
Cathy
N5WVR
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>